When a genuine Christian happens to find himself settled down as a clergyman
of the church of England in addition to the troublesome memories of the
inconvenient declarations by which he reached his position, he must frequently
be the victim of mental nausea at the sight of the motley squadron in which he
is enrolled. There is good Mr. Ryle, an indefatigable Tractarian, who
hates Romish Tractarianism, and preaches the gospel thoroughly and there are
many, like him the excellent of the earth, distinguished for piety, who would be
an honor to any denomination of Christians: a believer in Jesus feels much
comfort in such company; but who are those spirits in red, white, and blue?
Aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, in their dress at any rate. Their voice
is Babylonian even as their apparel; they hail from Rome, and are affectionately
attached to the Mother of Harlots. Can the lover of truth go with these? Can the
believer in the Lord Jesus Christ's pure gospel sit in the same congress with
these priests? Bow at the same altar? Unite in church fellowship with them?
Surely the more gracious a man is the more irksome must such fellowship become.
That searching question, "What concord hath Christ with Belial?" if it ever
intrudes itself into rectories, must torture any evangelical clergyman who keeps
a tender conscience. Moreover, on the other side of the quadrangle of the
Establishment one sees a Philistine regiment of skeptics, with a bishop to head
them, and all sorts of dignitaries to make up the battalion. Can the spiritual
mind find peace in an affinity with these? Can it be to the evangelical
clergyman, who is truly converted, a fact to sleep quietly upon, that he is in
full communion with these unbelievers? The apostolical inquiry, "What part hath
he that believeth with an infidel?" must surely at times ring through the manse,
and startle the quiet of the vicarage library. How our brethren manage to read
the burial service over ungodly men, how they can subscribe to the catechism,
and many other enormities of the Book of Common Prayer, remains to us an enigma
towards the solution of which we have not advanced a hair's breadth since the
day when we provoked so much indignation by our sermon on "Baptismal
Regeneration;" but the first bitter draught of subscription, and the subsequent
doses of catechism and rubric, are not all the annoyances of conforming
Puritans, for many of them are so sorely vexed with daily ecclesiastical
troubles, that they might almost say with David, "All the day long have I been
plagued, and chastened every morning." We would pity them for being placed in so
unenviable a position were they not free to get out of it whenever they please:
lacking room for commiseration, we adopt another form of good wishing, and pray
that their yoke may become heavier day by day, and their surroundings more and
more intolerable, until they are driven forth from their self-chosen bonds. We
are the best friend of the Evangelicals, because we do not delude them into the
notion that their ecclesiastical union with Puseysim and Rationalism is
justifiable, but honestly urge them to quit their indefensible and dishonorable
position, and come out decidedly from all communion with the monster evils of
the Establishment. None will welcome them more heartily or help them more
industriously than he whom they adjudged to be unkind because of his outspoken
rebukes. Disapproving of Episcopacy as a form of church government, many
Dissenters would nevertheless rejoice to assist a free evangelical Episcopal
community formed by a great secession from the state church, and freed from its
glaring errors; and such a church would be vexed by no special bickerings and
jealousies between itself and the other members of the great evangelical family,
it would most probably enjoy a place of more than ordinary prestige, and might
possibly become the largest religious community in England. A little Scotch
backbone and wonders would be wrought. Alas! we fear that the Record school
teaches no lessons which can educate heroes, and we are afraid the evangelicals
will continue to be what the Puseyites call them, "the jellies," to the end of
the chapter.
In their work for the Lord, our Christian brethren in the
Establishment of the bolder stamp frequently find Churchianity a sad incumbrance
to them. In favored regions, where the gospel has long been preached, a circle
of believers has been formed, who form a church within the church, and
contribute greatly to the success and comfort of the clergyman; but in other
cases the Churchmen of the parish are a terrible nuisance to the Christian
incumbent. Laying aside for a moment our opinion of the inconsistency of his
official position, we cannot help sympathizing deeply with the minister who,
hampered and bound by his ecclesiastical connections, is nevertheless
struggling, as manfully as his condition allows, to preserve a gospel testimony
in the land. We wish God-speed to all such, as ministers of our Lord
Jesus, although we anxiously desire that their membership with the corrupt
church of England may, at any cost, speedily come to an end. We know that
hundreds of the excellent of the earth are preaching the pure word of truth
every Sabbath within the bounds of Episcopalianism, with hearts breaking for
heaviness because their parishioners loathe the gospel, and hate them for the
gospel's sake. "Ah," said a clergyman to us a few months ago, "your people love
you, and if you are ill they are all praying to have you restored, but as for
me, they would set the bells ringing in my parish if I were dead, for gospel
truth is abominable in the esteem of most of them, and they hate me for keeping
ritualism out of my church." This was, probably, an extreme case, but there are
many of a similar kind, though not so intense in degree. May such brethren be
upheld by their great Master to war a good warfare, and to remain faithful to
the faith once committed to the saints. Inconsistent as they are, we cannot
deliberate for a single moment as to which side to take in the contest between
them and Ritualists and worldlings; they are our brethren notwithstanding their
shortcoming, their cause is the cause of truth and righteousness, so far as they
preach the gospel of Jesus, and may it triumph beyond their own expectation,
even to the destruction of the union between church and state. They deserve to
be driven out of the Establishment, in which they are intruders, towards which
they are Dissenters, for which they have defiled their reputations among their
Nonconforming brethren, but, as men fighting in a wicked world against deadly
errors, they deserve the prayers of all believers, and the best assistance that
can be rendered by all Christians.
In the Bucks Herald a serious
complaint is laid against the zealous Vicar of Winslow, by a Churchman,
which we shall use as an illustration of the quarrel between Christianity and
Churchianity. The allegations appear to us to be very justly brought by the
writer from his Churchianity point of view; the vicar is a Christian, and has no
right in the Anglican church, and when his vestry condemns him, it is simply the
voice of the church with which he has unhappily allied himself protesting
against the religion of Jesus, which shines in his course of action. If an
honest Englishman enlists in the French army in time of war, he must not wonder
if his British manners are offensive to his Gallic connections; he should not
put himself in so false a position, but range himself on the side to which, by
lineage and loyalty, he belongs. It is curious to note that the great sins which
the Vicar of Winslow has committed against Churchianity, are precisely the very
acts which, under Christianity, are accounted as virtues. His good before the
Lord of hosts is evil in the judgment of perverse men. "In Winslow," says the
Churchman, "there is a most decided church feeling. Many of us, with the
greatest regret, leave our parish church, who have never done so before; others,
who from circumstances are unable to do so, feel the want of good services, but
submit to what they get. Our vicar, I believe, thinks himself sincere and right;
but he forgets that other persons may (as in this instance they do) hold
contrary views to his, to which views he will not yield in the slightest degree,
although it would be for the benefit of the church of which he is a priest, and
of which we are the true and loving people." Of course he is a priest, and his
own prayer book calls him so, and yet we venture to guess that he disowns the
title. His parishioners are right enough in murmuring at his want of
churchmanship, but he is more right still, though very inconsistent, in putting
Christ before the church.
Now for the gross transgressions of the vicar,
which are chiefly threefold. Item the first. He has been guilty of Christian
love. He has committed against Churchianity the high crime and misdemeanor
of loving his brethren in the faith, whereas he ought to have denounced them all
as schismatics and heretics. The charge needs no comment from us, all sound
judges will see that the case is parallel to that against Paul and Silas, at
Philippi, "these men, being Christians, do exceedingly trouble our city, and
teach customs which it is not lawful for us to receive, being Churchmen." Here
are the very words of the accusation—"the holding of prayer meetings, at which
all denominations of Christians were invited to attend, and to offer up prayer
in alphabetical order, regardless of sect, and under the presidency of the
vicar." Horrible! is it not, O bitter bigot? Lovely! is it not, disciple of
Jesus?
Item second. He has vindicated, as well as he could, a weak
point in his teaching, and has been anxious to win over those who differ. He
is accused of preaching "special sermons upon such subjects as Holy Baptism,
and inviting the Baptists to attend, when that denomination of Christians had
just established a new place of worship." Churchianity does not think those
vile Baptists to be worth powder and shot. To preach to them is as bad as Paul
preaching among the uncircumcised Gentiles. It is useless to try to convert
them, and it is dangerous to ventilate the subject of Baptism, because the
church is so very fond of Infant Baptism, and the matter is so exceedingly
doubtful, that it is better not to stir in it. The Baptists, mark you, reader,
do not complain; they are glad that every Paedobaptist should declare his own
views, and they feel so safe in their own entrenchments that they look for
converts whenever the subject is brought before the public mind; but the
churchman complains grievously because Baptists are even bidden to come and be
rectified by the vicar; let them alone, they are heretics and arch enemies of
Churchianity; let them go to their own place, both here and
hereafter.
Item third. The vicar has had the impertinence to be
faithful as a pastor. This is a very serious business, and, we should
imagine, is at the bottom of the whole complaint. He has trodden on some
people's gouty toes, and touched their besetting sins with too rough a hand.
"Thus," saith the church-scribe, "the preaching of sermons upon such subjects as
balls and concerts, when such private and public entertainments were about to be
given; I say that, in my belief, these things have been calculated to send
church-goers elsewhere, such sermons as I have mentioned coming under the head
of personal ones, which should always be avoided." Christianity approves of holy
boldness in reproof, and integrity in declaring the whole counsel of God, but
Churchianity loves gaiety and frivolity, and would have a dumb dog in the
pulpit, who will not rebuke it. Whenever Churchianity has ruled, revelry and
wantonness have been winked at, so long as saints' days, sacraments, and priests
have been regarded. God's law is nothing to the high church, so long as church
forms are scrupulously and ostentatiously observed. We should see maypoles
erected and danced around on a Sunday afternoon within a year, if Churchianity
had its way; the Book of Sports would be revived, and the evening of the Lord's
day would be dedicated to the devil. Leave the church open, observe saints'
days, decorate the altar, sing "Hymns Ancient and Modern," put on tagrags, and
all goes smoothly with Churchianity: preach the gospel, and denounce sin, and
straightway there is no small stir.
Well, good Mr. Vicar, may you be yet
more vile in these men's sight, until they cast you out of the national church
as your Master was driven forth before you. May you please God more and more,
and make the devil and all his allies heartily sick of you. Saving your
vicarage, and professed churchmanship, about which we can see nothing desirable,
we esteem you highly, and hope that you and the like of you may evermore be
sustained by the abounding mercy of the great Head of the one only true church,
which is the remnant according to the election of grace: May Christianity rule
and Churchianity be cast to the moles and to the bats.
Added to Bible
Bulletin Board's "Spurgeon Collection" by:
Tony Capoccia
Bible Bulletin Board
Box 119
Columbus, New Jersey,
USA, 08022
Our websites: http://www.biblebb.com/ and http://www.gospelgems.com/
Email: tony@biblebb.com
Online since
1986